Legal Opinion

United States v. Geoffrey Disston

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided August 15, 1978No. 77-1353PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PELL, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from the district court’s orders denying without an evidentiary hearing the defendant’s (Disston) motion for new trial on the basis of newly discovered evidence, Fed.R.Crim.P. 33, and denying his petition for writ of habeas corpus, 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Disston seeks relief on the ground that he was denied his Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights during his trial in which he was convicted for mail fraud. 1 He first argues that the Government violated his rights by failing to inform him that his co-defendant, Roger Camp, was a Government informer. This, he…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Weatherford v. BurseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. United States v. James Vincent KeoghCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. Richard KellyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
  2. United States v. George Jackson and James JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  3. Harry Aleman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. TurnerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1979
  5. United States v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API