Reynolds v. State
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Graham. A. G. McAlister, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtCunningham, J.
The appellant, with two codefendants, was indicted by the grand jury of Graham county for the alleged crime of robbery. Upon a trial this appellant was convicted of the crime, and his codefendants were acquitted of the charge. In due time the appellant moved for a new trial and in arrest of judgment, which motions were denied, *538and judgment and sentence of a conviction for robbery was entered. An appeal is prosecuted from tbe orders and from tbe judgment.
Tbe appellant relies upon two grounds of error for a reversal, viz.: Because no evidence was produced at tbe trial proving or tending to…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Lear v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1931