Legal Opinion

Dean v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided August 28, 1985No. 05-83-01032-CRPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPARLING, Justice.

We withdraw our former opinion and substitute the following as the opinion of this court.

Arthur Lawrence Dean was convicted by a jury of aggravated robbery. He appeals his 15-year sentence, contending that provisions of the Texas Speedy Trial Act, TEX. CODE CRIM.PROC.ANN. art. 32A.02 (Vernon Supp.1985) were violated; that on rein-dictment the State relied on evidence excluded by an expunction order; that appellant’s fingerprints, found at the robbery site, were insufficient evidence of his guilt; and that the indictment should have been quashed for failing to specify which…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Barfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  2. Freeman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  3. McKinney v. BlankenshipTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Wade v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  5. Phelps v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dean v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  2. Gambling Paraphernalia, Devices, Equipment & Proceeds v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2000
  3. Semento v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
  4. Chapa v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
  5. Roderick Nash v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API