Dean v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1Opinion of the Court
SPARLING, Justice.
We withdraw our former opinion and substitute the following as the opinion of this court.
Arthur Lawrence Dean was convicted by a jury of aggravated robbery. He appeals his 15-year sentence, contending that provisions of the Texas Speedy Trial Act, TEX. CODE CRIM.PROC.ANN. art. 32A.02 (Vernon Supp.1985) were violated; that on rein-dictment the State relied on evidence excluded by an expunction order; that appellant’s fingerprints, found at the robbery site, were insufficient evidence of his guilt; and that the indictment should have been quashed for failing to specify which…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Barfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Freeman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- McKinney v. BlankenshipTexas Supreme Court · 1955
- Wade v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Phelps v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dean v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Gambling Paraphernalia, Devices, Equipment & Proceeds v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Semento v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Chapa v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Roderick Nash v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.