Legal Opinion

Brinkerhoff v. Mayor of Jersey City

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 5, 1900PublishedCited by 9 opinions

On error to the- Supreme Court. This case was tried at the December Term, 1898, of the Hudson Circuit Court, before Mr. Justice Lippincott and a jury, and a verdict, directed for the plaintiff for $1,620.80 and costs.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Magie, Chief Justice.

The judgment brought here by this writ of error was rendered upon a verdict directed by the trial judge.

The action of Brinkerhoff, in whose favor the verdict was directed, was brought to recover the salary or compensation for services as corporation counsel of Jersey City, for January, February and March, 1894. It appeared in evidence that on December 27th, 1893, Brinkerhoff had been appointed to that office by the votes of four of the five members of the board of finance of said city.

The evidence appearing in the bills of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Norton v. Shelby CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. State v. CarrollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1871
  3. Erwin v. Mayor of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1897
  4. The People of N.C. Ex Rel . Norfleet v. . Staton, Jr.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
  5. Town of Plymouth v. PainterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1846

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jersey City v. Dept. of Civil ServiceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  2. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Angier CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1931
  3. Swede v. City of CliftonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  4. Von Nieda v. BennettSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
  5. Buckler v. BowenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API