Legal Opinion

Clark v. . Henderson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 19, 1930PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cueiam.

The only assignment of error set out in the transcript filed in this Court on plaintiffs’ appeal, is based on their exception to the judgment. There is no error in the judgment. It is supported by the verdict.

The contention of plaintiffs that there was error in the instruction of the court to the jury with respect to the first issue, although discussed in the brief filed for plaintiffs in this Court, cannot be considered for the reason that this contention is not presented by an assignment of error made as required by the rules of this Court. See Rules of Practice in the Supreme…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rader v. Queen City Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  2. Worsley v. S. &. W. Rendering Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Glace v. Pilot Throwing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API