Legal Opinion
Attorney General v. Ankersen
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided February 3, 1986No. Docket 68079, 79829PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShepherd, P.J.
Plaintiffs, as the appropriate agents of the State of Michigan, commenced this action on February 14, 1977, seeking: (1) abatement of a nuisance caused by improper storage of hazardous industrial waste at 400 South Boulevard East in Pontiac resulting in a fire hazard; (2) imposition of a lien on the property and/or payment of costs for expenses incurred in investigating, securing and abating the hazard; and (3) indemnification from a surety company. Defendants in this suit are the various partnerships and individuals who owned and operated the waste disposal business on the premises and the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Ross v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
- Rosario v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
- Buckeye Union Fire Insurance v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
- Bein v. HeathSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Joseph Casias v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Marilyn Froling Revocable Living Trust v. Bloomfield Hills Country ClubMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
- People v. BrownMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
- Ypsilanti Fire Marshal v. KircherMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
- Livonia Building Materials Co. v. Harrison Construction Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2007
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.