McDonald v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtSuarez, J.
This is an appeal from an order denying a motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The appellant in point four of his motion claimed that the prosecution deliberately used false evidence in violation of Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150, 92 S.Ct. 763, 31 L.Ed.2d 104 (1972). In point five, the appellant claimed that the prosecution deliberately destroyed exculpatory evidence in bad faith, in violation of Arizona v. Youngblood, 488 U.S. 51, 109 S.Ct. 333, 102 L.Ed.2d 281 (1988). The trial court declined to reach to merits of both claims, stating that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Rivera v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
- Swain v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
3Cited by1 opinion
- Clark v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections (Putnam County)District Court, M.D. Florida · 2025