Legal Opinion
United States v. Duane Jones
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 5, 2012No. 12-50042PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THOMAS, Circuit Judge:
In this appeal from the district court’s revocation of supervised release, we consider whether the district court erred in treating a state criminal conviction as a felony rather than a misdemeanor, when the sole categorical difference was a recidivist history. We conclude that the district court properly considered the conviction as a felony. However, because the district court included a written special condition of supervised release that the court did not include in its oral pronouncement of sentence, we must vacate the judgment and remand for further…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. Moses Corona-Sanchez, A/K/A Enrique Sanchez-CoronaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Solomon Bitton Simtob, United States of America v. Solomon Bitton Simtob, AKA Simon SimtobCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. RodriquezSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- United States v. WaknineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Dean Harvey HicksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. HoldenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Khalil CarterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Jack HoldenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Christopher TorresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Gordon MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.