Brown v. St. Charles
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Clare. (Hart, J.) Trover. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
The plaintiff sued the defendant in trover for the alleged conversion of a promissory note.
The defendant had verdict and judgment in the court below.
The plaintiff alleges as error that the charge of the court was misleading, and not correct in law as applied to the facts and the claims of the respective parties to the suit.
It seems that some parties residing at Roscommon, in this State, were desirous of obtaining a foothold at the village of Meredith, in Clare county, for the purpose of selling intoxicating liquors. '
The village lots in Meredith were all sold and conveyed by the original…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Central Savings Bank v. O'ConnorMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
- Solomon v. StewartMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. MorlanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- Colvin v. GoffOregon Supreme Court · 1916
- Lanphere v. AcklesMichigan Supreme Court · 1922