Legal Opinion

Harang v. Crusel

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 20, 1930No. 13,340Published

1Opinion of the CourtWesterfield, J.

This suit grows out of a contract between plaintiff and defendant for the sale of certain stock. The contract was in the form of a letter addressed by defendant to plaintiff and accepted by plaintiff.

The suit is for the sum of $300, approximately one-half of the expenses incurred by the plaintiff, Harang, in an effort to sell the stock, and is based upon the following clause in the contract:•

“It is further understood that in the event that the sales of Petroleum Royalties Company shares of stock will yield sufficient profit to - J. Edw. Crusel, he will, out of the profits from commissions or…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McLemore v. HemlerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API