Legal Opinion
State v. Donald
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided September 26, 2000No. 1 CA-CR 97-0551-PRPublished
1Opinion of the Court
10 P.3d 1193 (2000)
198 Ariz. 406
STATE of Arizona, Respondent,
v.
Victor Gene DONALD, Petitioner.
No. 1 CA-CR 97-0551-PR.
Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department E.
September 26, 2000.
Richard M. Romley, Maricopa County Attorney by Gerald R. Grant, Deputy County Attorney, Phoenix, Attorneys for Respondent.
Victor Gene Donald, In Propria Persona, Yuma, for Petitioner.
OPINION
FIDEL, Judge.
¶ 1 Victor Gene Donald petitions for review of the trial court's summary dismissal of his petition for post-conviction relief. He contends that he rejected a plea agreement because his attorney provided…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.