Legal Opinion

State v. Brower

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 9, 1998No. 89968PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

713 So.2d 1005 (1998)

STATE of Florida, Petitioner,

v.

Richard BROWER, Respondent.

No. 89968.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 9, 1998.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and David M. Schultz, Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for Petitioner.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Joseph R. Chloupek, Assistant Public Defender, Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, West Palm Beach, for Respondent.

SHAW, Justice.

We have for review Brower v. State, 684 So.2d 1378 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996), based on conflict with Carmichael v. State, 715 So.2d 247 (Fla.1998). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, §…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Pariente; Concurrence · Pariente; Dissent; Concurrence · Anstead.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Coney v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  2. Amends. to Fl. Rules of Crim. Proc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1996
  3. Carmichael v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
  4. State v. MejiaSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
  5. Brower v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brower v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  2. Lee v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
  3. Neal v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API