Legal Opinion
Eunhasu Corporation v. Norguard Insurance Company
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 14, 2020No. 1:19-cv-07696Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK EUNHASU CORPORATION, Plaintiff, OPINION & ORDER – against – 19 Civ. 7696 (ER) NORGUARD INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. RAMOS, D.J.: Before the Court is Eunhasu Corporation’s motion to strike seven of NorGuard Insurance Company’s affirmative defenses and impose sanctions against it. For the reasons discussed below, Eunhasu’s motions are DENIED. I. BACKGROUND NorGuard began insuring the Manhattan property located at 146-148 West 28th Street, owned by Eunhasu, in January 2017. Am. Compl. ¶ 10–11, Doc. 24. �e insurance policy was effective…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Pavelic & LeFlore v. Marvel Entertainment Group, Div. of Cadence Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Fantasy, Inc. v. FogertyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Lipsky v. Commonwealth United Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Martens v. ThomannCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.