Legal Opinion
Tina Marie Ramsey, Claimant v. Andrew Saul, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided January 2, 2018No. 18-cv-553-SMPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Tina Marie Ramsey, Claimant v. Case No. 18-cv-553-SM Opinion No.
2019 DNH 127
Andrew Saul, 1 Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant O R D E R Pursuant to
42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3), claimant, Tina Marie Ramsey, moves to reverse or vacate the Commissioner’s decision denying her applications for Disability Insurance Benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act and Supplemental Security Income Benefits under Title XVI. See
42 U.S.C. §§ 423, 1381-1383c (collectively, the “Act”). The Commissioner objects and moves…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Barnhart v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ramsey v. US Social Security Administration, Acting CommissionerDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2019