Legal Opinion

Lowenberg v. Bernd

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 15, 1871PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to First District Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Bliss, Judge,

delivered tbe opinion of tbe court.

Tbe plaintiff claims to be tbe owner of land upon wbicb was situate a log bouse, wbicb defendant removed, and this action is brought for tbe damages suffered. Tbe controversy arose from a disputed boundary line, each party claiming that tbe bouse was situate upon bis own land. Tbe bill of exceptions is very defective in its exhibit of evidence, and it- does not certainly appear that it was taken and signed at tbe trial term. But, waiving this, on looking into the case I find tbe claim of tbe plaintiff to be altogether inequitable. Purchasers of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matson v. CalhounSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
  2. Arthur v. RickardsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1871

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kolb v. Golden Rule Baking Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. MorganSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
  3. State ex rel. Crow v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
  4. Hunt v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1882
  5. Priestley v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1878

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API