Legal Opinion · Dissent

Giles v. Oakdale Healthcare Systems, LLC

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 9, 2012No. 11-1197Published

1DissentGremillion, Judge

_JjIn this matter, the drug-testing specimen collector, Carpenter, admittedly failed to follow Oakdale’s policies for collecting samples. Plaintiff, Giles, an assistant manager for Wal-Mart, suffered adverse employment consequences because her sample tested positive for proscribed substances. Carpenter and Oakdale filed a motion for summary judgment in which they argued that the policy breach had nothing to do with Giles’s employment setbacks, because the violation of policy did not cause Giles’s sample to test positive for cocaine. In support of the motion, Carpenter testified by deposition…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. Our Lady of the Lake Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  2. Hopkins v. Sovereign Fire & Cas. Ins.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. Nicholson v. Calcasieu Parish Police JuryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. Johnson v. Lull Enterprises, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API