Legal Opinion

Pope v. Gap, Inc.

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided June 18, 1998No. 17529Published

1Opinion of the Court

961 P.2d 1283 (1998)

125 N.M. 376

1998-NMCA-103

Robert POPE, as guardian and personal representative of Chandler Pope, a minor, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

THE GAP, INC., a Delaware corporation, d/b/a Gap Kids, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 17529.

Court of Appeals of New Mexico.

June 18, 1998.

Randi McGinn, William B. Towle, McGinn & Associates, P.A., Albuquerque, for Appellant.

Luis G. Stelzner, Craig T. Erickson, Sheehan, Sheehan & Stelzner, P.A., Albuquerque, for Appellee.

OPINION

FLORES, Judge.

{1} In this appeal, we examine the meaning of an offer of judgment under Rule 1-068 NMRA 1998. Specifically, we…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Marek v. ChesnySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. United States v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. AugustSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. In Re Robert J. Young and Donna M. Young, Debtors. Fowler Brothers v. Robert J. Young and Donna M. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  5. Mallory v. EyrichCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API