Legal Opinion
Moser v. Bret Harte Union High School District
District Court, E.D. California
Decided January 12, 2005No. CIV-F-99-6273 OWW SMPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE: SANCTIONS FOR ATTORNEY’S VIOLATIONS OF DUTY OF CANDOR AND NOT TO IMPEDE, OBSTRUCT, OR TO VEXATIOUSLY MULTIPLY PROCEEDINGS
WANGER, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the court on an Order to Show Cause why sanctions should not be imposed against attorneys of record Elaine Yama (“Yama”), the law firm of Lozano, Smith and their client, Bret Harte Unified School District (“District” or “Defendant”), following their egregious conduct in this appeal from an administrative hearing.
II. BACKGROUND
The Order to Show Cause issued as the culmination of lengthy and contentious…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Richard L. Zaldivar v. City of Los Angeles, and Margaret Salazar, Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- B.K.B., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Maui Police Department, County of Maui, County of Maui, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Keister v. PPL Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- In Re BurghoffUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Iowa · 2007
- Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. v. Cooper Cameron Corp.District Court, E.D. California · 2009
- Telesaurus VPC, LLC v. PowerDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2012
- Shodeen v. Petit (Burghoff)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Iowa · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.