Legal Opinion

City of Lorain v. Tomasic

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1979No. 78-1216PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

The fundamental issue raised in this appeal is whether there is an unconstitutional conflict between Lorain Ordinance 719.03(a) and R. C. 2915.09(B)(5). The ordinance is entitled “Rules of Bingo Play” with paragraph (a) thereof indicating: “No more than twelve hundred dollars ($1,200.00) shall be paid out in prizes at any bingo session, exclusive of door prizes.” R. C. 2915.09 deals with rules for conducting bingo, and reads, in pertinent part: “(B) A charitable organization that conducts a bingo game shall not: * * * (5) Pay out more than three thousand five hundred dollars in prizes during…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brown v. Concerned Citizens for Sickle Cell Anemia, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. American Financial Services Ass'n v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. City of Eastlake v. Ohio Board of Building StandardsOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  3. City of Middleburg Heights v. Ohio Board of Building StandardsOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Brookbank v. GrayOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. City of Dayton v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2004

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API