Legal Opinion

Vant v. Vant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 14, 1990PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Barone, J.), dated December 15, 1988, which denied his objections to so much of an order of the same court (Miklitsch, H.E.), dated October 19, 1988, as denied his petition for the elimination of of the $60 per week alimony provision of the parties’ judgment of divorce.

*637Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In order to be entitled to a modification of alimony, the moving party has the burden of demonstrating a substantial change of circumstances…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kronenberg v. KronenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. Ardito v. ArditoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  3. Conklin v. ConklinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  4. Chisholm v. ChisholmAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  5. Kaplan v. KaplanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Stempler v. StemplerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. King v. KingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. Roth v. BowmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. Gellman v. GellmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  5. Catterson v. CattersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API