Legal Opinion

Constantin Refining Co. v. Crockett

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 18, 1922No. 13034PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

This proceeding in error has been regularly commenced in this court to review an award of ithe Industrial Commission of this state, which is as follows:

“Now on this 17th day of January, 1922, this cause comes on to be determined on the claimant’s claim for compensation for an injury which he alleges occurred to him while in the employment of the Constantin Refining Company on the 4th day of August, 1921, at Tulsa, Okla., and 'the commission having considered the testimony taken at a regular hearing at Tulsa, Okla., on the 29th day of November, 1921, before a member of the commission, at which…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Amerada Petroleum Corp. v. CookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. Asplund Construction Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  3. Chicago Bridge & Iron Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Galion Iron Works & Mfg. Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Princeton Mining Company v. LindsayIndiana Court of Appeals · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API