Legal Opinion
Engblom v. Carey
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 15, 1983No. 79 Civ. 4785 (RWS)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Marianne E. Engblom and Charles E. Palmer, two correction officers at the Mid-Orange Correctional Facility (“Mid-Orange”), brought this action seeking damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the Governor of New York and various prison officials of the State of New York (collectively “the defendants”). Currently before the court is the defendants’ motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 Fed.R. Civ.P. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted and the complaint dismissed.
The complaint in this action alleged that the plaintiffs’ Due…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Gomez v. ToledoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Wood v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Procunier v. NavaretteSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Skevofilax v. QuigleyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1984
- Marianne E. Engblom and Charles E. Palmer v. Hugh L. Carey, Governor of the State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983