United States v. James Harris, Jr., and Angelo Palermo
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
The government takes this appeal under 18 U.S.C. § 3781 from an order of suppression. We are to decide whether the F.B.I. agents were present on the premises lawfully, under the teachings of United States v. Horton, 328 F.2d 132 (3d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom. Edgar v. United States, 377 U.S. 970, 84 S.Ct. 1651, 12 L.Ed.2d 739 (1964), so as to permit reception of their testimonial observations and interrogations. The district court found that there was no consent to their entrance and suppressed observations made or statements taken thereafter. See Wong Sun v. United…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Government of Virgin Islands v. GereauCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- Harry C. Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
- Honig v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- Thomas v. Duralite Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Thomas v. Duralite Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Altemose Construction Company and Energy Contracting Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Altemose Construction Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975