Legal Opinion

State v. Gibson

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 9, 2006No. 3D06-203PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSuarez, J.

The State seeks a writ of certiorari, or in the alternative a writ of prohibition, quashing the trial court’s order placing conditions on a live lineup. We grant cer-tiorari and quash the order.

The defendant was arrested in the instant case for armed robbery with a firearm. At that time the State was also investigating the defendant’s involvement in a number of other offenses. The State issued a subpoena requiring the defendant to appear in a live lineup and explained to the trial court that the lineup related to the other criminal investigations and not the instant armed robbery. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. BloomSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. Saracusa v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  3. Doe v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
  4. State v. InvestigationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  5. State v. J. M.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. MARQUIS VALENTINE v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2020
  2. MARQUIS VALENTINE v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API