Legal Opinion

Cedar Rapids National Bank v. Mottle

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 13, 1911No. Nos. 17,268—(33)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Action transferred to the district court for Pine county to recover $126 upon a promissory note. The reply was a general denial. The case was tried before Stolberg, L, and a jury which returned a verdict in favor of defendant. Erom an order denying plaintiff’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, it appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtBunn, J.

Action to recover on a promissory note alleged to have been executed by defendant to the order of the Sterling Manufacturing Company of Cedar Rapids, Iowa, and indorsed to plaintiff. The note is as follows:

“Willow River, Minn., P. O.
“Cedar Rapids, Iowa, Mar. 21, 1908.
“For value received I promise to pay to the order of the Sterling Manufacturing Co., Cedar Rapids, Iowa, one hundred and twenty-six dollars ($126.00) at Cedar Rapids, Iowa, in six (6) instalments, payable as below:

Two months after date ............................. $21 00

Pour months after date............................. $21 00

Si…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. SchirmerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  2. Rieke v. St. Albans Land Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  3. Mullany v. Firemen's Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  4. PHL Variable Insurance v. 2008 Christa Joseph Irrevocable Trust Ex Rel. BNC National BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
  5. Johnson County Savings Bank v. WeibySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API