Legal Opinion

Sjuts v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 15, 2000No. 2D99-2092PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

NORTHCUTT, Judge.

The circuit court dismissed without prejudice two counterclaims filed by Dale Edward Sjuts in response to the State’s petition to involuntarily commit him pursuant to the Jimmy Ryce Act.1 We affirm the dismissals, but not for the reason advanced by the circuit court.

Sjuts was imprisoned for sexually violent offenses. As he neared the end of his prison term, the State Attorney for the Tenth Judicial Circuit filed a Ryce Act petition alleging that Sjuts was a sexually violent predator who must be committed for long-term control, care and treatment. Pursuant to section 394.915…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Vtn Consol. v. Coastal Engineering Assoc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  3. State Ex Rel. Smith v. JorandbySupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  4. Rupp v. PhilpotDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  5. Bentzel v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sjuts v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API