Legal Opinion

Tiernan v. Martin

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided July 15, 1842PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from the Commercial Court of New Orleans, Watts, J.

1Opinion of the CourtSimoN, J.

The object of this suit is the recovery of the sum of $5,200, which, it is alleged, the defendants assumed to pay to the plaintiffs, under the following circumstances. Moses Hall, being largely indebted to both parties, the defendants agreed with him, on the 17th of September, 1836, that, if he would execute to them a deed of trust on fifteen negroes, and convey to them a tract of land which was then encumbered with a deed of trust in favor of the plaintiffs, for which land a release from the trust was to be made by the plaintiffs, they would assume to pay to Tiernan, Cuddy & Co., the sum of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Decuir v. PackwoodSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1818

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Shaw Constructors, Cross-Appellee v. Icf Kaiser Engineers, Inc., Pcs Nitrogen Fertilizer, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  2. Allen & Currey Mfg. Co. v. Shreveport Waterworks Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1905
  3. Merco Manufacturing, Inc. v. J. P. McMichael Construction Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1974
  4. Freedman v. RatcliffSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
  5. Baker v. Bowie Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API