Legal Opinion · Dissent

Perez v. Abbott

District Court, W.D. Texas

Decided May 2, 2017No. SA-11-CV-360Published

1DissentJerry E. Smith, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent.

First, we no longer have Article III jurisdiction, because, under recent, binding Fifth Circuit caselaw, the case is moot, so we have a constitutional duty to dismiss. Second, although this court should not be issuing an advisory opinion on a matter that is moot, I dissent on the merits, assuming arguendo that the matter is not moot, insofar as the majority finds violations, with the exception of the majority’s treatment of DFW, as to which I agree with the result and largely with the reasoning. The majority’s findings of violations in other districts are insufficiently…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Miller v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Davis v. BandemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Shelby County v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Shaw v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API