Legal Opinion

Marathon International Petroleum Supply Co. v. I.T.I. Shipping, S.A.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 24, 1991No. 87 Civ. 3762 (RWS)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Plaintiff Marathon International Petroleum Supply Company (“MIPSCO”) initiated this maritime action against defendants I.T.I. Shipping, S.A. (“ITI”), its vessel, the M/T RUTH M, and Saybolt De Mexico, S.A. (“Saybolt”) for damages resulting from the presence of water in a shipment of oil from Rabón Grande, Mexico to the Louisiana Offshore Oil Port (“LOOP”). A bench trial was held on January 14 and 15, 1991 and final arguments were heard on March 7. Upon all the proceedings and the following findings of fact and conclusions of law, the complaint will be dismissed.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. Rozny v. MarnulIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Williams v. PolgarMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Robert & Company Associates v. Rhodes-Haverty PartnershipSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  5. Houseman v. Cargo of the Schooner North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1841

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Texport Oil Co. v. M/V AMOLYNTOSDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API