Legal Opinion
Blanc v. Mutual National Bank of New Orleans
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided December 15, 1876No. 5791PublishedCited by 3 opinions
APEAL from the Fifth District Court, parish of Orleans. Cullom, J.
1Opinion of the CourtLeonaed, J.
The plaintiff, Blanc, is the holder and owner of the following promissory note:
“ New Orleans, December 16,1872.
“ On the twenty-first day of January next after date I promise to pay to the order of H. E. Given & Oo. fifteen hundred dollars at the office of H. F. Given & Co., in New Orleans. Yalue received.
“(Signed) W. STACKHOUSE.
“(Indorsed) H. F. GIVEN & CO.”
On the day on which the note fell due, Messrs. H. E. Given & Oo. signed the following indorsement: “We hereby waive protest on this note, and *922hold ourselves responsible .for the payment of the same, which is hereby extended thirty days…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Smedes v. President of Bank of UticaNew York Supreme Court · 1823
- McKinster v. Bank of UticaNew York Supreme Court · 1832
- Armington's v. Gas Light & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1840
3Cited by3 opinions
- Justin v. Delta Motor LineLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1949
- Griffin v. NeelisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
- Public Inv. Co. v. StaffordLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1940