Legal Opinion

Porto v. Di Iuglio

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided April 7, 1947No. File 66699Published

1Opinion of the CourtQuinlan, J.

This case was tried to a jury, with the late Judge Pallotti presiding. In due and proper time notice of appeal was given. The presiding judge died before the evidence and charge were transcribed and before the presentation of a draft finding. Time having been expended on the within sub' ject, and so that the'effort may not be entirely unavailing, this memorandum, though not decisive, is filed.

“If error consists in rulings upon . . . evidence ... a finding by the trial court is necessary. ” Practice Book § 336. The charge of the court cannot be reviewed without a finding. Conn. App. Proc. §…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gannon v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1903
  2. Waterbury Trust Co. v. PorterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
  3. Yudkin v. GatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1891
  4. Lippitt v. BidwellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
  5. Papallo v. Meriden Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API