J.M.W. v. T.I.Z.

« 51 I agree with the judgment of the court and with much of its analysis, but write separately to identify some points of analytical disagreement and to offer my views on an alternative ground for affirmance. I concur in the majority's conclusions that Wyatt (1) failed to protect his interests as a putative father through strict compliance with the Utah Adoption Act, Urax Cong Ann. § 78B-6-101, to -104 (2008 & Supp.2010); and (2) did not preserve (and thus forfeited)1 the argument that the Parental Kidnapping Prevention Act ("PKPA"), 28 U.S.C. § 1788A (2006), divests the district court of…