Legal Opinion

Francis J. Hilderbrand v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 3, 1962No. 6987_1PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

The appeal is from an order of the court below, denying appellant’s petition for a writ of error coram nobis which sought to vacate and set aside the judgment and sentence entered upon his plea of guilty to an indictment. The petition for writ of error coram nobis may properly be treated as a motion to vacate the judgment and sentence under 28 U.S. C.A. § 2255. Stephens v. United States, 10 Cir., 246 F.2d 607; Bell v. United States, 9 Cir., 269 F.2d 419.

In 1952 appellant was indicted in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington on a charge of murder in the first…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. GallagherCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
  2. Levine v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
  3. June Heyward Stephens v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
  4. Mahaffey v. HudspethCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
  5. United States v. BinkDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1947

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. William Herman JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
  2. United States v. De VaughnCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  3. United States v. MarcelloDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1968
  4. State v. GomezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  5. James Norman Yeloushan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API