Glew v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 75, October T., 1911, by defendant from judgment of C. P. Washington Co., Feb. T., 1910, No. 103, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Thomas Glew v. Pittsburgh Railways Company. Trespass for personal injuries.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 75, October T., 1911, by defendant from judgment of C. P. Washington Co., Feb. T., 1910, No. 103, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Thomas Glew v. Pittsburgh Railways Company. Trespass for personal injuries. The facts appear in the following opinion by Mcllvaine, P. J., overruling motion for judgment non obstante veredicto: This motion raises bnt a single question, and that is, did the Court err in refusing the defendant’s .request to give the jury binding instructions to find in its favor. The plaintiff was an employee of the defendant company. He was a motorman engaged to run…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
The judgment is affirmed on the opinion of the learned President Judge of the Common Pleas.
2Cited by2 opinions
- Moleskey v. South Fork Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
- Brown v. Armstrong & Latta Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913