Legal Opinion

In re Spence

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 1, 1958No. 6387PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRich, Judge

Appellant asks us to reverse the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals which affirms the final rejection of a single claim of his application serial No. 324,919, filed December 9, 1952, for Flexible Coupling. The only question is patentability over prior art.

The invention relates to means for flexibly coupling two lengths of rigid pipe, particularly heavy-duty pipe such as is used in dredging-operations. The objects of the invention are flexibility at the joint, ruggedness, and prevention of accidental detachment of the coupling-parts.

Appellant provides a rubber sleeve having a bore…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Application of Thomas L. Jacobs and Ronald S. BauerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  2. Application of Josef Fried and Josef E. HerzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
  3. Application of Calvin M. HammackCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API