Legal Opinion

Continental Insurance v. Clayton Hardtop Skiff

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 13, 1966No. 15435PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BIGGS, Circuit Judge.

The suit at bar is based on original and exclusive admiralty jurisidiction, 28 U.S. C. § 1333. The opinion of Judge Lane in the court below, 239 F.Supp. 815 (1965), contains a complete and accurate statement of relevant facts in this case. We shall not repeat them except where necessary.

The respondent-appellee, Piperata, owned a skiff, the “Skipton”, and insured it for $10,000 with Continental Insurance Co., the libellant-appellant. The “Skipton” was “lost” during the hurricane of March 1962. On March 20, 1962 Piperata executed a proof of loss to Continental requesting…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bradlie v. the Maryland Insurance CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1838
  2. Purofied Down Products Corp. v. Travelers Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
  3. Workman v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
  4. Mason v. Marine Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1901
  5. Calmar S. S. Corp. v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Continental Insurance Company v. The Clayton Hardtop SkiffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API