Continental Insurance v. Clayton Hardtop Skiff
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BIGGS, Circuit Judge.
The suit at bar is based on original and exclusive admiralty jurisidiction, 28 U.S. C. § 1333. The opinion of Judge Lane in the court below, 239 F.Supp. 815 (1965), contains a complete and accurate statement of relevant facts in this case. We shall not repeat them except where necessary.
The respondent-appellee, Piperata, owned a skiff, the “Skipton”, and insured it for $10,000 with Continental Insurance Co., the libellant-appellant. The “Skipton” was “lost” during the hurricane of March 1962. On March 20, 1962 Piperata executed a proof of loss to Continental requesting…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bradlie v. the Maryland Insurance CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1838
- Purofied Down Products Corp. v. Travelers Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Workman v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
- Mason v. Marine Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1901
- Calmar S. S. Corp. v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Continental Insurance Company v. The Clayton Hardtop SkiffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966