Jones v. Chiado Corp.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GRANT, Judge.
The issue presented in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in denying defendants-appellants’ motion for a directed verdict on plaintiff-appellee’s cause of action alleging fraud. The jury returned a verdict in favor of appellee (Jones), and against appellants (Chiado and Pace) for the sum of $118,466.74 on the fraud count. For the reasons hereafter stated we reverse the judgment of the trial court.
Viewing the facts, as we must, in a light most favorable to sustaining the judgment, see Polk v. Koerner, 111 Ariz. 493, 533 P.2d 660 (1975); Cagle v. Carr, 101 Ariz.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Upton v. TribilcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Polk v. KoernerArizona Supreme Court · 1975
- Standard Manufacturing Co. v. SlotWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
- Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. FerrellArizona Supreme Court · 1933
- Apolito v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jay Bennett v. Isagenix International LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- Lerner v. DMB Realty, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- In Re Jackson National Life Insurance Co. Premium LitigationDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2000
- Lubin v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
- Lerner v. DMB Realty, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.