Legal Opinion

Jones v. Chiado Corp.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 24, 1983No. 1 CA-CIV 5533PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GRANT, Judge.

The issue presented in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in denying defendants-appellants’ motion for a directed verdict on plaintiff-appellee’s cause of action alleging fraud. The jury returned a verdict in favor of appellee (Jones), and against appellants (Chiado and Pace) for the sum of $118,466.74 on the fraud count. For the reasons hereafter stated we reverse the judgment of the trial court.

Viewing the facts, as we must, in a light most favorable to sustaining the judgment, see Polk v. Koerner, 111 Ariz. 493, 533 P.2d 660 (1975); Cagle v. Carr, 101 Ariz.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Upton v. TribilcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Polk v. KoernerArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Standard Manufacturing Co. v. SlotWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. FerrellArizona Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Apolito v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jay Bennett v. Isagenix International LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
  2. Lerner v. DMB Realty, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  3. In Re Jackson National Life Insurance Co. Premium LitigationDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2000
  4. Lubin v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  5. Lerner v. DMB Realty, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API