Legal Opinion

Schroeder v. Nielson

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1894No. 5272PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from the district court of Douglas county. Tried below before Estelle, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Ragan, C.

Ered Schroeder sued David H. Nielson in the district court of Douglas county on a promissory note given by the latter to Ingolsbe & Co., and by them assigned to Schroeder. The case was tried to the court, a jury being waived, and Nielson had judgment, and Schroeder brings the case here on error.

The trial court specifically found that the note was given without consideration and that Schroeder purchased it with knowledge of that fact. The evidence fully supports the findings of the court.

Counsel for plaintiff in error cite us to numerous authorities, among others, Moses v. Comstock, 4…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nash v. LullMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  2. Moses v. ComstockNebraska Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Shawnee State Bank v. LydickNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Shawnee State Bank v. VansyckleNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Levy v. CunninghamNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Johnson v. EnglishNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Central City Bank v. RiceNebraska Supreme Court · 1895

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API