Legal Opinion

Miguel Vines v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided August 17, 1994No. 92-4419PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COX, Circuit Judge:

This appeal arises out of the denial of Miguel Vines’s § 2255 motion. On this appeal we must determine whether the temporary absence of a defendant’s trial counsel during the presentation of evidence necessarily gives rise to an irrebuttable presumption of prejudice that mandates vacation of that defendant’s conviction. We conclude that the temporary absence of counsel during the presentation of evidence is not per se violative of the Sixth Amendment right to the assistance of counsel.

I. BACKGROUND

In June of 1988, a senior Customs inspector examined the shipping documents…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
  2. State v. ScherzerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
  3. Jones v. WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  4. Lewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  5. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1997

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API