Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 3, 1937PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBland, J.

This, is a suit on an accident insurance policy issued by the defendant in favor of the plaintiff. There was a verdict and judgment for plaintiff in the sum .of $2017.15, plus interest in, the sum of $39.32.- Defendant has appealed.

■ The policy -provided for a weekly indemnity of $20, for not to exceed 104 weeks, in the event that insured should sustain an acci -dental visible injury, rendering him “unable to follow his usual vocation.”

The facts show that plaintiff was engaged as a locomotive fireman for the Chicago & Alton Railroad Company. On February 28, 1934, while the policy was in full…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Chapman v. Kansas City, Clinton & Springfield Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  2. Dent v. Monarch Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. Austin v. Bluff City Shoe Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1913
  4. Ridenour v. Wilcox Mines Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. Schmidt v. St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Morris v. ReedMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Turner v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Baker v. Sovereign Camp Woodmen of the WorldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1938
  4. Linda Kissell d/b/a Full Moon Sports Bar and Driving Range v. McMinn County CommissionCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API