Legal Opinion
S & R Corp. v. Jiffy Lube International, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 23, 1992No. Nos. 91-5614, 91-5887PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ROTH, Circuit Judge.
This multi-faceted case began with a suit by Appellees S & R Corporation and Durst (collectively “Durst”) against Appellant Jiffy Lube1, claiming breach of a trademark license agreement. The present appeal arises from the district court's denial of Jiffy Lube’s motion for a preliminary injunction to halt Durst’s continued use of the Jiffy Lube trademark. Durst has continued to use this trademark despite formal termination of his franchise agreements in July of 1990. Because we find that Jiffy Lube has clearly established irreparable injury to its mark…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Opticians Ass'n of America v. Independent Opticians of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Hoxworth v. Blinder, Robinson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- United States Jaycees v. Philadelphia JayceesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Arthur Guinness & Sons, Plc v. Sterling Publishing Company, Inc., and Bantam Books, Inc., Intervenor-DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Bill Blass, Ltd. And Pincus Bros., Inc. v. Saz Corp. And Zion, Abraham. Appeal of Saz Corporation and Abraham ZionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- McDonald's Corp. v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- Jiffy Lube Intern., Inc. v. Weiss Bros., Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
- General Motors Corp. v. Phat Cat Carts, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2007
- Best Western International, Inc. v. PatelDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2007
- Dentsply International, Inc. v. Great White, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.