Legal Opinion

Bank of New York v. Hyland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 22, 1987PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously modified, on the law, and as modified, affirmed, without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: The court properly denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. By their affidavits and that of their accountant, defendants made a sufficient showing in opposition to the motion to raise triable questions of fact on the validity of their defenses to notes (CPLR 3212 [b]; Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562). Moreover, in view of plaintiff’s failure to comply with defendants’ discovery notice and its inability to produce certain records pertinent to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Rochester Poster Advertising Co. v. Town of PenfieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  3. Korobkin v. ChalekNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Dain & Dill, Inc. v. BettertonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
  5. Korobkin v. ChalekAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Campbell v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API