Legal Opinion

In re the Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of Goldberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 15, 1935Published

1Opinion of the Court

Order of the Surrogate’s Court of Queens county denying motion for examination of the administrator before trial reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, without costs; examination to proceed at a time and place to be stated in the order. The examination sought relates to the affairs of the estate of Bertha Goldberg and the knowledge respecting those affairs possessed by the administrator, Samuel P. Goldberg, as such. It was, therefore, an examination that should have been allowed in the exercise of sound legal discretion. (Nagel v.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Nagel v. NagelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API