Potter v. Village of Hammondsport
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendant," The Tillage of Hammondsport, from an order made by-the county judge of Steuben county, in aii action in the Supreme Court, and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Steuben on the 14th day of March, 1905, modifying an order theretofore made for the examination of the plaintiff before trial.
1Opinion of the Court
Kruse, J.:
We all agree that the order appealed from should be modified. There is, however, a division among us respecting the examining *92physicians and surgeons. The'county judge in his original order named three physicians, one of- whom was a woman., ' Subsequently he modified the order, by striking out these names and naming two Women physicians. It is now proposed that this court shall, strike out the names of these two physicians last appointed and restore the names of the three physicians originally appointed. We think this modification ought not to be made. 1. No good reason exists,.so…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. BotsfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Lyon v. Manhattan Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mizak v. Carborundum Co.New York Supreme Court · 1912
- Black v. BisgierNew York Supreme Court · 1931
- Wood v. HoffmanNew York Supreme Court · 1907