Legal Opinion

Eaton Corporation and Subsidiaries v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided June 26, 2013No. 5576-12Published

1Opinion of the Court

140 T.C. No. 18

UNITED STATES TAX COURT EATON CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 5576-12. Filed June 26, 2013. P and R entered into two advance pricing agreements (APAs) establishing a transfer pricing methodology for covered transactions between P and its subsidiaries. P and R agreed in the APAs that the APAs’ legal effect and administration were governed by certain revenue procedures. R determined P did not comply with the applicable terms and canceled the APAs. R issued P a deficiency notice and applied an alternative transfer…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Jack E. Golsen and Sylvia H. Golsen v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
  2. Naftel v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1985
  3. Greenberg's Express, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1974
  4. Mailman v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1988
  5. Commissioner v. EngleSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API