United States v. Asher, Robert B.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
A. LEON HIGGINBOTHAM, JR., Circuit Judge,
concurring in part and dissenting in part.
Although the majority believes the primary question before us is the effect of United States v. McNally upon appellant’s mail fraud and related convictions, I am convinced that a principled approach to this appeal begins and ends by assessing the only aspect of this appeal that clearly bears upon every count of appellant’s convictions: the propriety and effect of the district court’s decision to admit into evidence a prosecution witness’s prior hearsay statement. Along with the majority, I conclude that the…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- McNally v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. Jose Figueroa, Angel Lebron, and Ralph AcostaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Government of the Virgin Islands v. Schiller TotoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.