State ex rel. Hughes v. Hamm
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
EMBRY, Justice.
In this appeal our decision is of necessity limited to a determination of whether the trial court correctly found that no fraud infected the transaction which was the subject matter of this litigation. We, as was the trial court, are confined to the facts and issues agreed upon by the parties in the case in making that determination.
The facts ■ essential to an understanding of the issues presented by this appeal are as follows: During 1971 Messrs. Norman Earley, Herman Watson, Jr. and Jack Giles (partners d/b/a Realty Management Corporation) became aware of the probability that…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Herricks v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
- State Ex Rel. Baxley v. GivhanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
3Cited by1 opinion
- Williamson v. ClineSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976