Legal Opinion

O'Donnell v. Sinnott

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 21, 1943PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner is a war veteran, but not a disabled veteran. He held a position as laborer in the office of the clerk of Kings County. Having been appointed without competitive examination, he was in the exempt class (Civil Service Law § 13, subd. 4). He was one of three exempt laborers, each of whom received a salary of $1,900 a year. The appropriating body eliminated one of these positions by reducing the number of laborers provided for at $1,900 from three to two. The two incumbents other than petitioner were nonveterans and junior in point of service to petitioner. The question presented is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Davison v. . WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Matter of Stutzbach v. . ColerNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  3. Matter of Clancy v. HalleranNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  4. Matter of Devins v. . SayerNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  5. Devins v. SayerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Clare v. SilverAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
  2. Copeland v. Division of Veterans' AffairsNew York Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Mandle v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API