Legal Opinion

People v. Gottman

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 10, 1976No. Crim. 15137PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ELKINGTON, J.

We granted a rehearing following our initial opinion on this appeal, in order to give further consideration to the Attorney General’s insistence that the opinion constituted “a triumph of illogic over justice.” The issue raised in the petition concerns the role of a jury in the administration of criminal justice.

Defendant Gottman was charged with (1) “rape by threat of great bodily harm,” a violation of Penal Code section 261, subdivision 3, and (2) a violation of Penal Code section 288a which proscribed the act of copulating the sexual organ of one person with the mouth…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Horning v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. People v. RedmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. United States v. DoughertyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  4. People v. MussendenNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
  5. United States v. MoylanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1969

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. People v. SanchezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  4. People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  5. People v. PartnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API