Legal Opinion · Dissent

Helvering v. Elkhorn Coal Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided April 5, 1938No. 4158Published

1DissentHenry H. Watkins, District Judge

I am unable to concur in the foregoing opinion. The reasons therefor will be briefly stated. The prevailing opinion recites the facts at some length but seems to lose sight of the emphasis that should be placed upon certain determinative and uncontradicted findings of the Board of Tax Appeals. Prior to December, 1925, when the transactions in question took place, Elkhorn Coal & Coke Company and Mill Creek Coal & Coke Company, both organized under the laws of West Virginia, had been actively engaged in coal mining operations; the former since its organization in 1889, and the latter since its…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gregory v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Gross v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
  3. Gross v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API